eolocation testing is one of those things that only feels obvious after it goes wrong. Many teams skip global software testing until a customer in another market complains that checkout is broken or content is blocked. By then, you’re scrambling instead of preventing the issue in the first place.

Most teams know they should test globally, but the sticking point is how. Flying testers around the world isn’t realistic, and hiring locals in every market gets expensive fast. Luckily, there’s a much simpler way to handle geolocation testing.

What is geolocation testing?

Geolocation testing means checking that your software behaves correctly when accessed from different locations. It's more than just checking if the translation is correct. It's about performance, compliance, payments, and user experience across regions For example: Do UK users see pounds instead of dollars? Are GDPR cookie consent banners appearing for European visitors? Can Australian customers select local shipping options?

Teams often skip it because it sounds complicated or costly. But ignoring it leaves a blind spot that can tank trust and revenue. The wake-up call usually comes when customers start reporting prices in the wrong currency, missing features, or blocked content. At that point, you’re in catch-up mode instead of fixing problems before release.

How to test in different locations (and why most attempts fall short)

When teams start wondering how to test in different locations, they tend to reach for a few obvious options. Each has its limits:

• Flying somewhere: Works, but it’s expensive, slow, and useless for day-to-day bug verification. You can’t board a plane every sprint.
• Hiring local testers: Great for cultural and usability insights, but clunky for fast technical checks. You need results in hours, not days.
• VPNs: They route all your traffic through their servers, which can interfere with other software you’re running. They don’t integrate with automated testing tools, and you’re limited to one at a time.
• Application hacks: Forcing fake locations in your code might “work,” but it doesn’t replicate the real user journey. Easy to accidentally leave in these code changes when you release, too.

Each option might help occasionally, but none scales into a reliable workflow for global app testing.

How to simulate geolocation with proxy servers

Proxy servers change the game for global app testing. They route your traffic through servers in different countries, making websites think you're browsing from there. But most proxies you'll find online are built for people who want to hide their identity or access blocked content. That's not what you need for testing.

For testing, you need proxies that:

• Always connect from the exact location you choose
• Don't get blocked by websites
• Stay connected reliably during your tests
• Let you test multiple locations at once

Regular privacy proxies often jump between different servers or use IP addresses that websites recognize as "fake." That makes your test results unreliable. You need a proxy service designed specifically for testing, not for watching Netflix from another country.

WonderProxy is designed for testing

WonderProxy is purpose-built for QA workflows. It's a proxy server network with servers in 98 countries that lets you route your web traffic through different locations reliably and fast. When you browse your site through their German server, your website thinks you're actually in Germany – you see German pricing, GDPR banners, local content, the works.

Why we think WonderProxy is a great help:

• Browser extension for quick manual checks
• Global coverage with locations in 98 countries
• API integration with tools like Selenium and Cypress for automation
• Built specifically for testers, not just consumers

How it works in practice: Connect through their proxy, browse your site normally, and see exactly what users in that location see. The key advantage is you're testing the real user experience, not a simulation or hack.

Starting your global software testing workflow

You don't need to test everything at once. Start small:

Pick key markets first: Focus on the countries that matter most to your business (pro-tip: think revenue not traffic!). Can people in the UK buy your product using pounds instead of dollars? Do customers in Canada see payment methods they actually use? Are visitors from Japan able to access all the content they should? Don't try to test every country on day one.

Use your existing test plans: You don't need to reinvent your testing approach. Take your existing test cases and run them from different locations using localization test tools. The scenarios are the same – you're just changing where you run them from.

Keep it checklist simple: Focus on location-dependent features like pricing, payment methods, content restrictions, and compliance requirements. These are where the biggest problems usually hide.

Track what you've covered: Keep simple progress tracking so you know which markets are verified and which need attention. A spreadsheet works to start, but you'll want something more organized as you scale up.

The pros and cons of global testing

Like most things in QA, geolocation testing comes with trade-offs. It’s not about deciding if it’s worth doing at all (it is), but about knowing what you’ll gain and what you’ll need to manage.

The pros are obvious: Catch problems before customers do, verify compliance requirements, understand real performance across markets, and avoid embarrassing currency or content errors.

The cons are real too: Adds complexity to your testing workflow, can slow down release cycles if overdone, and requires ongoing maintenance as you add markets and features.

The balance: Focus on markets that matter to your business, test the features that are location-dependent, and don't try to achieve perfect coverage. The goal isn't testing everything everywhere – it's catching the obvious problems before they become customer complaints.

Making geolocation testing part of your process

Global app testing doesn’t need to be overwhelming. Tools like WonderProxy cover the technical side of simulating location. What’s left is workflow – keeping your team organized about what’s tested where.

For small setups, a spreadsheet is fine. But as soon as you add more markets or more testers, you’ll need something smoother. That’s where tools like Testpad help. Testpad gives you lightweight checklists to manage who’s testing what, without all the features of traditional test case management getting in your way.

Ready to start testing globally? Request a free trial of WonderProxy and pair it with Testpad's 30-day free trial to keep your testing organized from day one.

If you liked this article, consider sharing