EDITORIALS
Checklists are quick, test cases are thorough. Choosing the right approach depends on your product, your team, and your timelines. It’s all about trade-offs and picking what works best for your testing.
EDITORIALS
Spreadsheets are where most test teams start, being familiar and easy to share. But they’re not great for rigid test cases or unstructured testing. That’s when it’s time to think about upgrading.
EDITORIALS
Your QA strategy isn’t about picking between automated or manual testing. It’s about using the right blend of tools and techniques to actually learn what your product does — before your users do. That’s where exploratory testing comes in.
EDITORIALS
You can’t fix what you don’t know is broken — and that’s where testing comes in. It's not just about hunting for bugs. It's about spotting gaps before they become problems, and catching surprises before they go public.
EDITORIALS
Testpad now has SOC 2 Type 1 certification – a major milestone that confirms we meet industry-recognised security standards, with the right controls in place to protect your data and manage risk properly.
EDITORIALS
Using ChatGPT can help you generate test ideas faster and more efficiently. We'll show you how Testpad's checklist format makes it easy to turn those AI-generated ideas into action.
EDITORIALS
If your test reports focus solely on what’s broken, you’re missing critical context about what’s working. Showing what passed builds confidence, improves decision-making, and brings clarity to your whole team.
EDITORIALS
Why bog down outsourced testers with formal test cases, step-by-step test scripts, and a tedious bug-reporting process? Checklist-style test plans make it easy for outsourced testers to get started, stay engaged, and showcase their test results.
EDITORIALS
A well-run UAT process prevents expensive last-minute surprises. It surfaces gaps between what was built and what’s actually needed. It’s not about technical correctness — it’s about practical effectiveness.
EDITORIALS
Checklists are quick, test cases are thorough. Choosing the right approach depends on your product, your team, and your timelines. It’s all about trade-offs and picking what works best for your testing.
EDITORIALS
Spreadsheets are where most test teams start, being familiar and easy to share. But they’re not great for rigid test cases or unstructured testing. That’s when it’s time to think about upgrading.
EDITORIALS
Your QA strategy isn’t about picking between automated or manual testing. It’s about using the right blend of tools and techniques to actually learn what your product does — before your users do. That’s where exploratory testing comes in.
EDITORIALS
Exploratory testing is essential to uncovering hidden issues and improving the quality of real-world usage. If you’ve ever found yourself wondering what exploratory testing is, you’re not alone — and you’re in the right place.
EDITORIALS
You can’t fix what you don’t know is broken — and that’s where testing comes in. It's not just about hunting for bugs. It's about spotting gaps before they become problems, and catching surprises before they go public.
EDITORIALS
Testpad now has SOC 2 Type 1 certification – a major milestone that confirms we meet industry-recognised security standards, with the right controls in place to protect your data and manage risk properly.
EDITORIALS
Using ChatGPT can help you generate test ideas faster and more efficiently. We'll show you how Testpad's checklist format makes it easy to turn those AI-generated ideas into action.
EDITORIALS
If your test reports focus solely on what’s broken, you’re missing critical context about what’s working. Showing what passed builds confidence, improves decision-making, and brings clarity to your whole team.
EDITORIALS
Why bog down outsourced testers with formal test cases, step-by-step test scripts, and a tedious bug-reporting process? Checklist-style test plans make it easy for outsourced testers to get started, stay engaged, and showcase their test results.
EDITORIALS
A well-run UAT process prevents expensive last-minute surprises. It surfaces gaps between what was built and what’s actually needed. It’s not about technical correctness — it’s about practical effectiveness.
